Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the multisite-clone-duplicator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
[www-stage.newsbtc.com/news/signature-bank-closure-is-political-says-says-ex-congressman-a-strong-anti-crypto-message/amp/]
[wp-includes/functions.php:6114 trigger_error(), wp-includes/functions.php:6054 wp_trigger_error(), wp-includes/l10n.php:1370 _doing_it_wrong(), wp-includes/l10n.php:1408 _load_textdomain_just_in_time(), wp-includes/l10n.php:194 get_translations_for_domain(), wp-includes/l10n.php:306 translate(), wp-content/plugins/multisite-clone-duplicator/include/lang.php:6 __(), wp-content/plugins/multisite-clone-duplicator/multisite-clone-duplicator.php:32 require_once('wp-content/plugins/multisite-clone-duplicator/include/lang.php'), wp-settings.php:471 include_once('wp-content/plugins/multisite-clone-duplicator/multisite-clone-duplicator.php'), wp-config.php:53 require_once('wp-settings.php'), wp-load.php:50 require_once('wp-config.php'), wp-blog-header.php:13 require_once('wp-load.php'), index.php:17 require('wp-blog-header.php')]

Signature Bank's Closure Is Political And A Strong Anti-Crypto Message, Ex-Congressman

Signature Bank’s Closure Is Political And A Strong Anti-Crypto Message, Ex-Congressman

Signature Bank closure

Barney Frank, the director of Signature bank and a former congressman who helped draft the Dodd-Frank Act, has stated that the lender is solvent and that there was “no real objective reason” for the bank to be closed. He said regulators wanted to send a strong anti-crypto message.

The Real Reasons Behind Signature Bank’s Closure?

The vague statement issued by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) on the closure of Signature Bank claimed the move was “in order to protect depositors.”

Compared to the detailed order passed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) when they took over Silicon Valley Bank, citing inadequate liquidity and insolvency, the NYDFS statement regarding Signature Bank is vague and lacks any fact-finding order. The DFPI appointed the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as the receiver of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB).

The transfer of SVB’s assets to the FDIC led to a temporary retracement of crypto assets, including Bitcoin. Meanwhile, USDC, the stablecoin issued by Circle, which had $3.3 billion stuck in the tech lender, de-pegged. But as of March 14, the stablecoin is trading at parity with the USD.

Bitcoin Price On March 14| Source: BTCUSDT On Binance, TradingView

Industry participants have concluded that Signature Bank was shut down because of its pro-crypto stance and the fact that it was facilitating stablecoin liquidity using its Signet network. The government’s actions may have been prompted by the opportunity over the weekend from SVB’s failure. This is the third major bank with ties to crypto to collapse in less than a month.

Silvergate bank was shut down, then SVB went insolvent. With $110 billion in assets, Signature Bank went under due to a $10 billion bank run, though it had $88 billion deposits filing.

https://twitter.com/twobitidiot/status/1635314474260512770

Senator Elizabeth Warren Blames Trump As SEC Cracks Down On Crypto

Senator Elizabeth Warren has blamed the Trump administration for the closure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which she claims was largely due to the rollback of critical parts of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2018. Warren has called for Congress, banking regulators, and the current administration to reverse these actions as an immediate priority.

The closure of Signature Bank might be a message that the industry is targeted. This comes when Bradley Garlinghouse, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Ripple, a blockchain company, maintains that United States regulations don’t favor innovation, especially in crypto. 

Together with other executives, including Christian Larsen, Bradley was sued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The regulator claims they sold unregistered securities in XRP during their initial coin offering where they raised over $1 billion.

Feature Image From Ed Jones/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images, Chart From TradingView
Exit mobile version